With many DST sponsors that have limited track records, it is critical to thoroughly review the sponsor in detail before making an investment decision.
In our previous post, we explained how the DST market has experienced strong growth in recent years. We cautioned about how new DST sponsors may be motivated to use controversial cash flow assumptions and strategies that may not match actual returns.
In this discussion, we offer suggestions on how you can help protect your clients’ investments by concentrating your DST due diligence efforts on the sponsors. Since DST sponsors may vary in experience, strategy, and overall capability, several themes identified here can help you assess and compare essential differences.
The experience and skill of a DST sponsor are a few of the most important considerations to be evaluated. Points to assess include:
A sponsor's size and financial strength can help you evaluate how they’ve managed DSTs over time and through difficult market cycles. Consider:
Reviewing the deals a sponsor has introduced, managed, and closed over time can help assess their ability to perform. Consider:
Evaluating underwriting procedures can help reveal how thorough and consistent a sponsor is when reviewing properties. Look for:
As with any investment, fees can significantly impact returns. To ensure that a sponsor’s DST fees are fair, reasonable, and competitive, consider:
A DST can provide a reliable source of income while your clients are invested, but the exit strategy can have a meaningful impact on overall returns. Points to assess include:
This isn’t a comprehensive list. You may want to explore other aspects of a DST sponsor, including their reliance on third-party reporting and validation, and investor communication capabilities. By reviewing the items we identify here, you’ll go a long way to narrowing the investment options for your clients and improve the likelihood they ultimately work with one of the premier industry sponsors.